Worn soft boots @Suggestion

[Renato Ribeiro]

Hello everyone,
I'm here to suggest a feature that can help no only me, but much other people.
In full check, we check true conditions using (id<x) or (specified name<x), etc. Why we can't check a worn soft boots? Eg.: (worn soft boots>=1), if this condition return true, continue to the next point, same as full check default.

Thanks and bye.

Edit: Now thinking, if I put the id of worn soft boots, like (ID>=1), will work? Hahaha

[garst123]

Hello everyone,
I'm here to suggest a feature that can help no only me, but much other people.
In full check, we check true conditions using (id<x) or (specified name<x), etc. Why we can't check a worn soft boots? Eg.: (worn soft boots>=1), if this condition return true, continue to the next point, same as full check default.

Thanks and bye.

Edit: Now thinking, if I put the id of worn soft boots, like (ID>=1), will work? Hahaha

with id it will work, u just need to have it on opened bp or equiped

[Kimoszin]

You got to read the wiki?